A Reflection
Flash mobs, to use a terrible pun, were quite literally a flash-in-the-pan phenomenon. Created by a man known only by "Bill" in summer of 2003, they spread globally with rapid pace and died out almost completely by the winter of that same year. In the summer of 2005, flash mobs officially "sold out" so-to-speak, with Ford's "flash concerts" that promoted their latest model, the Fusion. This past March, Harper's magazine reflected upon the flash mob phenomenon and simultaneously revealed its inventor: Bill Wasik, who just happens to be the senior editor at Harper's.
Wasik revealed that it was a self-fulfilling prophecy, an attempt to make fun of hipster culture, and above all a social experiment designed to demonstrate the joining urge of human beings. He planned the lifespan of the flash mob in its entirety, from the first flash mob to its backlash, downfall, and subsequent commercialization. He even helped it progress along his chosen path by providing interviews to every news outlet that asked in the hopes that it would blow up quickly and dissolve just as fast. He was almost completely right about everything, except for the impact of technology. He assumed handing out flyers would have had the same effect as using digital technology. On the contrary, the mob sensation wouldn't have been half as huge if it was even possible to restrict it to paper and physical interaction.
Wasik wanted to satirize hipsters, "those hundreds of thousands of educated young urbanites with strikingly similar tastes. Have so many self-alleged aesthetes ever been moreŠ'submerged in the group?' The hipsters make no pretense to divisions on principle, to forming intellectual or artistic camps; at any given moment, it is the same books, records, films that are judged au courant by all, leading to the curious spectacle of an 'alternative' culture more unanimous than the mainstream it ostensibly opposes. What critical impulse does exist among their number merely causes a favorite to be more readily abandoned, as abandoned it inevitably will be'". As a social psychology/sociology experiment, the results are fascinating. The sheer number of people who joined in on the flash mob craze is astounding, and it is doubtful that even Wasik himself expected how quickly and abundantly the mobs would spread.
While the content of the flash mobs themselves was apolitical (the ones Wasik organized, at least, although they were definitely transformed into political protest by some), the lifespan of the flash mob speaks volumes about digital networking, the nature of the human herding instinct, and the commercialization of everything.
How "Bill" Wanted It
To begin the experiment, Wasik sent a simple email on May 27, 2003 to about 60 friends and acquaintances. The email was vague, forwarded to himself by himself from an unused email address. It asked people to synchronize their watches and meet in a given location in New York. To avoid looking staged, he asked people to approach from different directions based on their birth month. Further instructions were to be given at the site by a random person via a slip of paper. The first mob failed due to the police receiving knowledge about it, but the second, which took place in the rug department of Macy's, was a success.
About 200 people came into Macy's and informed clerks that they were looking for a love rug for their commune that they all lived in. Wired News wrote about it two days later, and the flash mob spread rapidly to other cities. The New York Times, in an effort to have a leg up on the story that other newspapers didn't, predicted (correctly) a backlash to the flash mob sensation. Wasik suspected as much, although the Times had impeccable timing on the story.
Wasik announced that mob #8 would be the last "official new york flash mob" and would occur in early September of 2003. It was hijacked by a man with a neon sign in a briefcase, to which mobbers chanted "peace" and held up their fingers. A fitting end.
The final phase was the commercialization of the flash mob. Summer of 2005, Ford arranged "Fusion Flash concerts" to promote their latest car model which were supposedly in the spirit of the flash mob but were actually a poor butchering of it. Announced a week in advance and covered by multiple radio stations, they didn't really reflect the spirit of the flash mob and failed miserably.
Technology and Manipulation
Although the last flash mob was supposed to happen in September, they continued for many months. The reason they spread and evolved so quickly was due not only to the use of decentralized personal networking technology such as email and text messaging (often referred to as SMS technology- short message system), but because of their coverage by blogs, such as cheesebikini, ginger's blog, and satanslaundromat. Wasik notes that blogs are intimate due to their "inherently arcane content" and that "a mob spread partly by blogs was still, as I had intended, a virtual community made physical." The important thing here is that digital media is unique in that its virtual communities can inspire immediate action. Seeing coverage of a flash mob on television is much different from discussing it on a web forum with a community of likeminded individuals. Unless particularly motivated, one would be far less inclined to form a flash mob on their own than if a group discusses the prospect and logistics together. This in itself does not sound too significant, as flash mobs were never intended to mean anything, but it transfers to more meaningful activities as well. Organizing a subway party isn't going to change the world, but when you replace the content with something substantial, it can have powerful implications. Flash mob coverage by blogs makes them sound particularly enticing because they allow for participants to post pictures and write about the experience, and for readers to share similar experiences.
Another use of technology was the development of organizing networking websites. Sites like Flocksmart and xFlashmobs allow for people to become members, organize flash mobs, search for other planned flash mobs, and discuss them in forums. Flocksmart's search fields include country, organizer, date, and category. The categories listed are political, artistic, fun, and social. xFlashmobs has an extensive list of groups, a photograph feed, and allows for technologically advanced options such as sending preprogrammed messages automatically to event attendees' phones at a certain date and time. This eliminates the previous need for a person to hand out further instructions to flash mob participants upon arrival.
People not only took the flash mob idea and set up their own flash mobs in various cities, but they created subtypes of flash mobs. There are zombie walks, in which people dress as zombies and head through commercial areas, banging on storefronts and walking towards cemeteries; there are subway parties, in which people crowd the subway at rush hour to ease the monotony of the ride home (or annoy the hell out of riders); and there are pillow fights. There are bubble mobs and naked bike rides. Typing in "flash mob" on a photo-searching website such as Flickr yields 4,272 pictures, but typing in "zombie walk" yields 5,426. Flash mobs developed into more than 10-minute-or-less sporadic mobs of random activity. None of these above-mentioned public gatherings have any overt meaning, but they all evolved out of flash mobs.
Wasik commented that "in the media coverage of flash mobs, the most curious undercurrent was the notion, almost a wish, that they would someday become something serious." Should flash mobs have gone/go political? Wasik did not think it would work, but bloggers were emphatic about making the mobs political or artistic. Sean Savage of cheesebikini, the man credited with coining the term "flash mob" saw the mobs as practice for revolution: "Lion cubs spend a lot of time playing, learning to master their evolving powers. That play seems frivolous at first, but consider the big picture and you might realize that such play is not a waste of time." There were explicitly political flash mobs organized, such as a protest in Madrid after a terrorist attack, demanding more information from the government. Using SMS technology, between 3000 and 5000 gathered at the headquarters of Spain's ruling party, and since they were organized in a decentralized manner, could not face legal persecution. There seemed to be a divide between people who thought that flash mobs were supposed to be free of ideology, just a much-needed outlet for silliness, and others who felt that harnessing the ease of mobbing could be useful for protest.
The Big Idea
Flash mobs fizzled out mostly by the end of 2003, but they still go on, political or otherwise. Their importance is in showing how digital technology allows for the rapid spread of ideas and community that can be manifested in the so-called "real" world. Wasik thought that the flash mob could be similarly executed by the use of flyers. Naturally in this day and age, even if the first flash mobs HAD used flyers, someone would have started blogging about it, and the flash mob would have evolved the way it did, using SMS technology. But it also allowed for a greater variety of participants. If someone had handed out flyers, they might have stuck to their biases; people who looked their age, lived in their neighborhood. Virtual communities aided by digital technology allowed for people to come together on the basis of their want to join a flash mob, rather than their similarity to one another. Wasik also assumed they would only be taken up by hipsters, but I doubt that participants were limited to the perpetually hip. Looking at the numerous photos, you can see a huge diversity of people. Flash mobs may be largely history, but the power of digital networking is still evolving.
Note: This project was done for a media studies class in the Fall of 2006. The task was to outline a topic important to digital media.